| MAGAZINE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| MARKETPLACE | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| COMMUNITY | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| RESOURCES | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
![]() |
Cornerstone: September 2009 Good questions lead to better answers |
| Written by Lyle Quan | |
|
Thanks to two readers for recommending QBQ! – The Question Behind the Question, by John G. Miller and Managing in Times of Change by Michael Maginn. In QBQ! Miller discusses the fact that before we can embrace change we need to become accountable for our actions. I have heard people ask why a department has to go through change, or wonder aloud who dropped the ball and caused a shakeup. As Miller notes, these types of comments reflect a lack of personal accountability. Instead, we should ask how we can solve the problem. We cannot change how our fellow firefighters think about things but we can demonstrate a commitment to being accountable for what we do. Doing this helps us eliminate the negative and accentuate the positive. By asking better questions we naturally will receive better answers. Miller notes that there are three simple guidelines for creating a QBQ, which are:
My favourite notation in Miller’s book relates to what he calls gaps of integrity. This is when your supervisor says, “I’m here to help you reach your personal goals” and then dresses you down in front of others. By becoming accountable for your actions, you will learn how to positively take action (by not blaming others for your mistakes). As Miller notes, “Even though there are risks involved in taking action, the alternative – inaction – is almost never the better choice.
A final lesson in Maginn’s book is that there are four broadly defined barriers that individuals may encounter when dealing with change. The first barrier is some form of resistance; the manager’s role is to motivate these individuals by defining the positive impact of change on the individual. The next barrier is loss of self-control; what used to be familiar is now distressingly strange. At this stage, the manager needs to coach and guide the individuals and teams through one-on-one meetings. The third challenge is the loss of power; this can be a tough area since many people associate their self-esteem with their level of authority within the organization. Finally, the challenge may be so formidable that individuals are unable to accept even the most tantalizing benefits – such as enhanced salary or relocation to a nicer region – because family or professional obligations might conflict and therefore accepting the change becomes a difficult personal sacrifice. Regardless, the manager needs to help the individual see what has been or will be gained through the change initiative. The keys here to accepting personal accountability are recognizing your role in the change initiative, communicating your intentions and supporting your team by asking how you can help members achieve their goals. Personal accountability is required at all levels but how we demonstrate it makes the difference. We all need to be accountable for our actions – whether we’re the fire chief, platoon chief, captain or firefighter and whether we’re leading change or simply finding a more effective way to do our jobs. Lyle Quan is a deputy fire chief with the Guelph Fire Department in Ontario. A 28-year veteran of emergency services he is an associate instructor for the Ontario Fire College, Lakeland College and Dalhousie University. Contact him at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it |
|
|
| Related Articles |
|---|
|
Between Alarms July 2010 by Jesse Challoner | 07/06/2010 CFF-From the Editor July 2010 by Laura King | 07/06/2010 Leadership Forum: June 2010 by E. David Hodgins | 06/03/2010 Volunteer Vision: June 2010 by Brad Patton | 06/03/2010 Cornerstone: June 2010 by Lyle Quan | 06/03/2010 |






