E-newsletter Sign Up
Fire Fighting in Canada
Subscription Centre
  ABOUT US  |  CONTACT US  |  SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE  |  ADVERTISE  |  SITEMAP  |  BUYERS GUIDE  |  BLOG
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Video Archive
Digital Magazine
MARKETPLACE
Job Board
Classifieds
Firehall Bookstore
Firehall Mall
New Products
 
COMMUNITY
Blog
Events
Photo Gallery
Brigade News
 
RESOURCES
E-Newsletter
Links
Buyers Guide
Sitemap
 
Sean Tracey NFPA Impact: SCBA and PASS changes protect hazmat responders

SCBA and PASS changes protect hazmat responders

Written by Sean Tracey   
seantracey2The National Fire Protection Association has released its second edition of "A Needs Assessment of the U.S. Fire Service". It is unfortunate but we have no equivalent study on Canadian fire service needs. I believe, however, that culturally there is little difference in the operations of fire services across the border. It is therefore not a big leap in logic to assume that the same deficiencies found in the U.S. fire service might be found in Canada. Of interest is the change in the number of departments equipped with self-contained breathing apparatus and personal alert safety system devices. The NFPA study reports that the percentage of departments without enough SCBA to equip a shift declined by eight percentage points to 28 per cent from 36 per cent in the four years between the two studies. The percentage without enough PASS devices to equip a shift declined by 13 percentage points to 29 per cent from 42 per cent.

Both of these devices are considered essential life-saving components. It is encouraging to see the increase in numbers but there is still a way to go to meet the 100 per cent mark. Standards for both of these pieces of equipment have gone through significant changes with the release of the 2007 editions. In the case of SCBA, the changes represent a legal requirement to meet U.S. federal workplace safety requirements. In the case of the PASS devices, the changes are driven by the noted failure of the devices under extreme conditions.

NFPA 1982, the standard for PASS devices, was last issued in 1998. In a number of recent instances of firefighter fatalities, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in the U.S. reported that PASS alarm signals were not heard or were barely audible. These were devices that had been certified to the standard. In 2005, NFPA issued an alert notice on this and a number of changes were initiated to the standard. New, more stringent, performance requirements were developed for these devices. If you missed the information releases on PASS device failures you can see it at www.nfpa.org.

What does this mean for existing PASS device users? In spite of these observed problems, the PASS device remains an essential piece of the firefighter's kit.

PASS devices should continue to be used but personnel need to be aware that under extreme conditions the performance of the PASS device may be adversely affected. Personnel should be aware that proper incident-command practices should be followed on scene.

The major change to SCBA is that all emergency services SCBA must now also be certified as chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) in accordance with the NIOSH statement of standard for CBRN SCBA testing. The NIOSH standards were essential for U.S. acceptance of the SCBA as it is required that any first responders performing any level of CBRN tasks must be properly equipped for these tasks. The upside is that this also means higher standards for protection of first responders in industrial chemical incidents. In addition to the new CBRN requirement, significant new requirements were added to increase the safety to the users of emergency services SCBA and to better assure the proper functioning of the SCBA. These include improvements in voice communication performance, a new pressure gauge independent of the heads-up display, water immersion tests for electronic devices that are part of the SCBA (similar to the expectations of the PASS device performance) and new, low-power capacity requirements for electronic devices to ensure that such devices will continue to function properly for at least two hours following activation of the low-power signal.

As a final note, there is currently a joint Canadian Standards Association/Canadian General Standards Board project to review Canadian standards for CBRN protective clothing. This is an initiative being funded by the Canadian Department of National Defence's CBRN Research and Technology Initiative. Concerns have been raised by the fire service on the intent of this project and these concerns have been responded to by the CSA, which is encouraging the fire service to participate through the Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs (which is a member). The CSA's Ron Meyers says the intent of the project team is "to provide guidance on the selection, use and care of PPE for use in CBRN events.

"Guidance on the selection of appropriate PPE will be based on realistic scenarios and the roles that responders would play in a CBRN event."

Furthermore, he states, "A key objective is also to provide information on the limitations and capabilities of equipment as this will help responders in making informed decisions when responding to a CBRN event."

Sean Tracey, P.Eng., is the Canadian regional manager of NFPA International and formerly the Canadian Armed Forces Fire Marshal. He may be reached at 613-830-9102, e-mail This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .